Coherent Structures from Spatio-Temporal Frequency Responses

At first view, turbulent flows look 'statistical’, i.e. random and unorganized. Depending on the flow conditions and geometry, there are however multitudes of organized flow structures buried in this randomness. They are commonly referred to as coherent structures. One effective technique to dig them out of the random mess is to look for peaks in the spatio-temporal power spectral densities of flow velocity or vorticity fields. This kind of 'data mining’ is done on the results of Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) data of the full Navier-Stokes equations. If on the other hand one deals with only the Linearized Navier-Stokes (LNS) equations (linearized around some mean or laminar flow condition, not to be confused with just the Stokes equations), then one can obtain the power spectral densities -in a 'simulation-free’ manner- from computations of the spatio-temporal frequency response. In this setting, coherent structures in turbulent flow correspond to the most resonant structures when the flow is excited by random body forces.

Input-output analysis of the linearized Navier-Stokes equations

main 

In the above setting, the LNS around laminar Poiseuille flow with body forces as inputs are shown. This is an input-output view of the flow dynamics with the 'disturbance’ body force field rmbf textcolor{blue}{d} as input, and flow field fluctuations (around laminar) rmbf textcolor{red}{tilde{u}} as the output. All fields are spatio-temporal signals. Even if the body force field rmbf textcolor{blue}{d} has no structure (i.e. is a white spatio-temporal random field), the output rmbf textcolor{red}{tilde{u}} will have a lot of structure inherited from the dynamics of the LNS.

Component-wise view of the spatio-temporal frequency response

main 

The 3x3 matrix of spatio-temporal frequency responses from each of the polarized body forces (d_x,d_y,d_z) to each of the components of the channel flow field fluctuations (tilde{u},tilde{v},tilde{w}). This frequency response is a large object! Due to translation invariance of the dynamics in time (t), streamwise (x) and spanwise (z) directions, it is an operator-valued function G(omega,k_x,k_z) of the temporal (omega), streamwise (k_x) and spanwise (k_z) frequency and wave numbers. The plots above are made easier to visualize by maxing over temporal frequency omega and wall-normal effects, i.e. by plotting

 	sup_{omega} sigma_{max} left(rule{0em}{1em} G(omega,k_x,k_z) right).

Note that if we integrate in omega and take a square-sum rather than a max of singular values, we get qualitatively similar plots. The above plots correspond to the spatio-temporal power spectral densities one would find if the LNS are excited by white random field body forces. However, they are computed here using singular values of an operator-valued function rather than a stochastic simulation!

The upper-right two components (from d_y, d_z to u) are by far the biggest (they scale with R^3, while all other subsystems scale with R). Their maxima are achieved near k_xapprox 0 and k_z approx 1.4-1.6. These spatio-temporal resonances are fundamental! Their structure is shown below.

The most 'resonant’ flow structures

main 

Isosurface plots of the most resonant flow structures according to the frequency response above. Note the greatly compressed streamwise axis scale. These structures are very long, alternating high and low streamwise velocity 'streaks’, interwoven with counter-rotating streamwise vortices.

Comparison with DNS data

main 

Related Papers